Animals by Don LePan

Animals by Don LePan

Soft Skull Press, New York, 2010

Borrowed from the library.

Sam is deaf and lives during a time when people with disabilities are being abandoned by society.  There is no effort to help the blind and deaf, no system for children born with a chronic  illness.  No one tries to find out what is wrong, Sam is just different, and he is eventually classified as “mongrel”.  His mother, left in dire financial straits, is forced to abandon him, hoping the family she leaves him with will adopt him as a pet.  A pet?

I am not cute.   I  am not a pet.  I am not a mongrel.  I am a child, that’s all.

Animals is told in two parts.  The first part is a manuscript telling Sam’s story, the story of his birth family and his adoptive family, written by Naomi Okun, the girl whose family does take him in.  The second part is an explanation, with abundant footnotes, by someone named Broderick Clark, of this autobiographical manuscript.  LePan has used an interesting structure to deal with a difficult subject, one many of us would just as soon ignore.

This is speculative fiction, fiction that, given the present circumstances, points towards a possible future.  It reminds me of Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World”.

There is no easy way to write about this.  We are in the future.  Due to factory farming and over use of antibiotics there has been a “great extinction”.  All of our domestic animals and pets have died.  There is a lack of protein and people are struggling.  There is a campaign stressing the dangers of soy.  The gap between rich and poor has widened exponentially. The world is edging towards chaos.

As more and more “sub-normal” people are marginalized and de-humanized, some are adopted as  “pets” and some are classified as chattel.  Eventually the chattel are gathered together, their labor is utilized and they become a food source.  Like I said, there is no easy way to write about this.

LaPan claims his main argument is against factory-farming and for the humane treatment of our food animals but I was left with a much broader sense of let’s stop eating meat(and fish), period.  This is a difficult and challenging book.  I feel like I need to put some distance between my first reading and then read it again.

I need to say that over the past few years I have grown closer and closer to becoming a true vegetarian.  There are occasions when I eat chicken or fish, and I am not vegan by any means, but something in me has me turning away from eating flesh.  Maybe it’s my knowledge of factory farms, or my awareness of the growing understanding of animal behavior and animal “consciousness”.  Maybe it’s the Buddhist idea of Ahimsa –  do no harm.  I buy organic when I can.  I eat tofu, legumes and lots of vegetables.  Animals, a deeply disturbing book, only reinforces my thoughts about food, about how we raise and slaughter what we eat.

Now I want to read Eating Animals by Jonathan Safran Foer.


Filed under 42SciFiChallenge, Animals, CanadianBookChallenge4, Culture, New Authors 2010, Review, SpeculativeFiction

9 responses to “Animals by Don LePan

  1. I’m sorry, but the premise of this book really disturbs me – for all the wrong reasons. Comparing marginalized peoples – be they disabled, non-white, etc – to animals is highly problematic due to the history of labeling many of these groups as sub-human (i.e. black people as monkeys, Jews as rats). This blog post and its comments explain (from a mostly anti-racist perspective) better than I can why this tactic is so troubling.

    And I’m not saying that animal rights is a bad cause, BTW. I only eat organic meat and dairy myself. I just have a real problem with a privileged individual (Don LePan being white, male, able-bodied, and presumably well-off) using an oppressed group of humans as stand-ins for animals.

    • El Fay – I agree, it is problematic. I’d be interested to see what LePan has to say about this, but I believe his premise is one of using marginalized people, however they are marginalized, as a resource for those with more wealth and power. His blog is here if you’d like to ask him about it.

  2. I have to agree that this book sounds pretty disturbing.I don’t know if I’m going to read it or not yet.

    • Vasilly – Animals is a difficult read but I wanted to finish it because I wanted to understand LePan premise, and his point. I’m not sure I do:)

  3. Ti

    I have a protein allergy so I cannot eat too much in the way of animal proteins. This has caused me great distress because there are lots of plant foods I am allergic to as well. BUT, I truly feel better on a plant based diet. I am just in denial.

    As disturbing as this books sounds, I feel compelled to read it.

    • Ti – Wow, a protein allergy? That is intense. Animals is a disturbing book but I think it is important. I think we need to know where our food comes from and how food animals are treated.

  4. Don LePan

    A very interesting discussion! You’ve prompted me to devote a long blog posting to this issue; I just put it up now ( Many thanks, and all the best,


    • Don-
      Thank you for sending the link to your post. If you haven’t already done so I would like to forward it to “EL Fay” and maybe generate some interesting comments.

  5. I tried to read this one a few months ago but found the premise disturbing and saw that it was going down a rather preachy road. I sent it back to the library.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s